This past week, I have been reading a lot of articles on being green and how we can do some simple things to stay green. It may be simple but I don't believe it will truly happen. If you want to get rid of the green house effect, it will mean you will have to make a real commitment to do it. This is what the scientists are saying:
It seems that divorce is paying a huge part to the green house effect. If no one was divorced in 2006, there would be 1 million less houses which would mean a decrease in trash pick up, use of electricity, less gas being used in cars. Can people go back to the era of no divorce. That would be awesome and you would be helping the environment. I do believe in divorce where physical abuse occurs but because you changed your mind about being married because it got hard is now unacceptable. We need to save the environment. So remember the original "I do" means forever.
The second thing we need to do is not pass gas. It seems that humans, pigs, cows and sheep produce so much methane gas that it is causing the green house effect. The Netherlands produce 50% more methane gas than anywhere else in the world. So say good bye to Mexican Food and other foods that cause the production of the passage of gas or you can buy an over the counter product like Beano. The kangaroo on the other hand does not produce methane gas so they don't need to modify their eating habits. So invest in Beano or another over the counter medicine that stops gas passage. Remember to be like Roo.
So remember, if you want to help the environment, stay married and don't pass gas. Sorry husbands, but when you pass that gas under the blanket and then barricade your wife under the covers so she can get the full effect, this is counter productive to having a green environment.
Have a great weekend.
Beamer 319
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/12/high_divorce_ra.php
Too bad that National Academy of Science publications aren't 'pair reviewed'. Cause then we could make a good pundit case for tree-hugging being a family virtue
Seriously though: does this study infer the reverse, that marriage and childbearing while living in a McMansion reduce average resource consumption over the long term? Three divorced guys sharing an efficiency flat in the city? Course not.
The issue is with what's in the denominator. Unit of time? Square feet of living space/person? This kind of "science" we don't need - thank you very much.
Scott,
Here is the article that gives you the information. The study was supported by Al Gore.
Take Care Beamer 319
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/nation/stories/120307dnnatdivorce.1819f4a.html
Post a Comment